Rahul v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the application was rendered so by counsel's statement.
Anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the application was rendered so by counsel's statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:175930
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9552 of 2024
Applicant :- Rahul Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 11.11.2024 Shalini
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahul
Krishan Pahal
Shalini Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court