Disposed

Rajendra and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Oct 2024ABAIL/9705/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application immediately without deciding it on merits as the counsel did not press the trial on admission. As an alternative, the Court directed expedited consideration of bail if the applicants surrender within two weeks and issued protection against coercive action during that period.

What did the court decide?

Relief refused; applicants directed to surrender within two weeks for expedited bail decision; no coercive action during that period.

Rajendra and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:165152

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9705 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Rajendra And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Vishwa Deepak Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 374 of 2023, under Section 147, 148, 308 I.P.C., Police Station-Mandidhanaura, District- Amroha.

¶8

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.

¶10

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if applicants surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and apply for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶12

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application U/s 438 Cr.P.C., stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 17.10.2024 Nitin Verma

¶15

Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajendra and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay vs State of U.P. and Another

Govind and 3 Others vs State of Up and Anothers

Smt Reena Jain and 2 Others vs State of Up and Another

Tanzeem @ Mohammad Tanzeem vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Marajeena vs State of Up

Farukh @ Fakru vs State of Up and Another