Dismissed

Tanzeem @ Mohammad Tanzeem v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC6 Nov 2024ABAIL/10077/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application on merit at the request of the counsel and instead directed the lower courts to decide a regular surrender bail application expeditiously within two weeks, ensuring no coercive action is taken during this period.

What did the court decide?

Refusal of anticipatory bail on merit; direction for expeditious disposal of regular bail application within two weeks of surrender.

Tanzeem @ Mohammad Tanzeem vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:173656

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10077 of 2024 Applicant :- Tanzeem @ Mohammad Tanzeem Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Meraj Ahmad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 296 of 2023, under Section 420 IPC & Section 15(2), (3) Indian Medical Council Act, Police Station- Asmoli, District- Sambhal, during the pendency of trial.

¶7

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another , reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶11

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶12

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶13

Order Date :- 6.11.2024/Aditya

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Tanzeem @ Mohammad Tanzeem v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tanzeem @ Mohammad Tanzeem v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Gaurav Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Manish and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Mukesh Kumar and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Jainarayan and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Anand Kishor vs State of U.P. and Another

Vijay Kumar and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and 6 Others