Partly allowed

Vijay Kumar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC28 Aug 2024ABAIL/8115/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An applicant moved for anticipatory bail but shifted to seeking directions for expedited disposal. The court directed expedited hearing upon surrender within two weeks and issued immunity from coercive action for that period before disposal. The main application is refused while the alternative prayer is partly granted via directions.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued for expedited bail hearing upon surrender within two weeks; no coercive action during this period.

Vijay Kumar vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:163838

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8115 of 2024 Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 383 of 2022, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 406, 471, 120-B IPC, Police Station- Jagdishpura, District- Agra.

¶7

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another , reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶11

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶12

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of.

¶13

Order Date :- 15.10.2024 Aditya

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vijay Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sahibe Alam vs State of U.P. and Another

Honey Alias Sunny Alias Rehan vs State of Up and Another

Rais Ahmad and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Rahul vs State of U.P. and Another

Anand Kishor vs State of U.P. and Another

Vivek Pandey vs State of U.P. and 2 Others