Disposed

Radhey Shyam Yadav and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC31 Aug 2024ABAIL/7953/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application for offences under Sections 323, 325, 504, 506 and 354-B IPC. Counsel did not press the relief on merits and sought a direction for prompt disposal of regular bail upon surrender. The court refused the anticipatory bail relief but granted two weeks' protection from coercive action and directed expeditious decision of the bail application per Satender Kumar Antil.

What the court decided

AI extract

Radhey Shyam Yadav and Another vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:188648

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7953 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Radhey Shyam Yadav And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Singh,Sarvagya Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 304 of 2017, under Section 323, 323, 325, 504, 506, 354-B I.P.C., Police Station-Balua, District-Chandauli.

¶8

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.

¶10

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if applicants surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and apply for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

¶12

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 2.12.2024

¶15

Nitin Verma

¶16

Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Radhey Shyam Yadav and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Radhey Shyam Yadav and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sadhu vs State of U.P. and Another

Vishal Singh and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Ankit and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Dharmendra Kumar vs State of U.P.

Dhirendra vs State of Up

Arvind Kumar vs State of U.P.