Court refused anticipatory bail but directed expeditious disposal of regular bail application upon surrender, granting temporary protection for three weeks.
Refused anticipatory bail; directed expeditious consideration of regular bail upon surrender; protection from arrest for 3 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:166839
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7667 of 2024
Applicant :- Dharmendra Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Pati Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 21.10.2024
Digitally signed by :- Nitin Verma NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail or direction for expeditious consideration of bail?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationReferred¶11
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922 · Who else cites this
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Dharmendra Kumar
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Deepak Verma
Parties & counsel
