In CA No. 7705 of 2024, the Allahabad High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. on the ground that the application had become infructuous, without recording detailed reasons.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:134598
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7705 of 2024
Applicant :- Raja @ Jane Aalam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anuj Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.406 of 2024, under sections 376, 506 IPC, Police Station Sadar Bazar, District- Shahjahanpur.
At the outset, Sri Anuj Bajpai, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant application has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.8.2024 Lbm/-
Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application is maintainable in light of it being rendered infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jane Aalam
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
