Dismissed
Nisha v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCBAILC/267/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application for bail cancellation by Nisha was dismissed due to non-appearance of the applicant to press the petition.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the applicant.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 72
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 267 of 2024
¶3
Applicant :- Nisha Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Raj Sachan,Rajesh Kumar Sachan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
¶5
- Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press the instant application.
¶6
- Accordingly, the Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶7
- Learned AGA for the State is present.
¶8
Order Date :- 5.8.2024 SFH
¶9
Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHIM HUSAIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Nisha
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAILC/267/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court