Shashank Sharma v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant voluntarily withdrew the anticipatory bail application. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
The applicant voluntarily withdrew the anticipatory bail application. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:169759
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7669 of 2024
Applicant :- Shashank Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this bail application and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Office shall return the certified copy of the impugned order to learned counsel for the applicant, after retaining a photocopy of the same.
Order Date :- 23.10.2024 Meenu Singh
Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shashank Sharma
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court