Anticipatory bail sought in a case involving intoxication, robbery and subsequent death. Applicant was named only through a co-accused's statement and had a criminal history. The court found allegations serious, noted differing parameters for anticipatory bail versus regular bail, and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:123629
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 756 of 2024 Applicant :- Rajanesh @ Bhura Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Vashistha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Jai Prakash Singh
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
different.
Order Date :- 30.7.2024 S.A.
Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, implicated via a co-accused's statement with no other cogent evidence and no prior naming in the FIR, should be granted anticipatory bail in a case of fatal robbery after intoxi
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajanesh @ Bhura
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
