Held that the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed as the applicant and co-accused attempted to pollute the examination system, distinguishing parameters between regular and anticipatory bail.
The instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:120571
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6350 of 2024
Applicant :- Ashish Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Kumar Pal,Rajesh Kumar Patel Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
matter.
Order Date :- 29.7.2024
SKM
Digitally signed by :- SHRAVANA KUMAR MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail given the allegations of polluting the examination system.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashish Kumar
State Of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
