In an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the Allahabad High Court dismissed the plea because the applicant failed to appear in court to press the application despite the list being revised for hearing.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:110638
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 701 of 2024
Applicant :- Shamim Opposite Party :- State Of Up Others Counsel for Applicant :- Amitrana Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Order Date :- 8.7.2024 K.K. Maurya
Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application can be dismissed for non-prosecution when the applicant did not appear to press the application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shamim
Vikram D. Chauhan
Kamlesh Kumar Maurya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
