The Allahabad High Court, upon noting the absence of the applicant and his counsel on the listed date and previously, held that the anticipatory bail application is rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:112726
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5657 of 2024
Applicant :- Nirmal Jain Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Prashant Krishan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vibhu Rai
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
List has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of applicant to press the application.
Previously on 5th July 2024, also no counsel appeared on behalf of applicant to press the application.
It seems that due to efflux of time the anticipatory bail application is rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is consigned to record.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 15.7.2024 S.Prakash
Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application became infructuous due to the efflux of time and non-appearance of the applicant.
Nirmal Jain
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Vikram D. Chauhan
Shashi Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
