Dismissed

Pradeep Kumar Maurya v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC5 Jul 2024ABAIL/6121/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hunble Court of Allahabad High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. as withdrawn by the applicant, granting liberty to approach the lower court for bail with a 15-day protection from coercive action.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to approach lower court for bail; 15-day non-coercive action suspension.

Pradeep Kumar Maurya vs State of Up and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:110362

¶2

Court No. - 73

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6121 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Maurya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kailash Nath Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Satyam Mishra

¶5

Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶7

The present Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant Pradeep Kumar Maurya in Case Crime No. 302 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120B I.P.C., Police Station - Didarganj, District - Azamgarh.

¶8

After some argument, learned counsel for the applicant states that he may be permitted to withdraw this application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. with liberty to file bail application before the court below.

¶9

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

Under the circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicant to approach the court concerned for bail. In order to enable the applicant to approach the court concerned for bail, for a period of 15 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. In case, the bail application is preferred by the applicant before the court concerned, the court concerned shall decide the same expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. While considering the bail application of the applicant, the court below shall keep in mind the principles of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 .

¶11

The anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and direction.

¶12

Order Date :- 8.7.2024 S.Prakash

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pradeep Kumar Maurya v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Kumar Maurya v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vijendra Singh Alias Brijendra Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Gaurav Singh and 10 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Naintara vs State of U.P.

Nirmal Jain vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rajanikant Shukla vs State of U.P. and Another

Shishu Pal Singh vs State of U.P. and Another