In this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the court dismissed the plea as not maintainable due to the absence of a summoning order, noting no apprehension of arrest existed at that stage.
Application dismissed; liberty granted to file fresh application after issuance of summoning order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:112744
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6820 of 2024
Applicant :- Sattar Hussain Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Order Date :- 15.7.2024 VMA
Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application is maintainable in the absence of a summoning order issued against the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sattar Hussain
Vikram D. Chauhan
Vishwa Mohan Arora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
