Dismissed

Vinod Kumar Singh v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC15 Jul 2024ABAIL/6384/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant withdrew his anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court dismissed the application with liberty to approach the lower court for bail and directed no coercive action for 15 days pending the new application.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file bail application before lower court; no coercive action for 15 days.

Vinod Kumar Singh vs State of Up and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:112471

¶2

Court No. - 73

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6384 of 2024 Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vijendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶6

The present Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant - Vinod Kumar Singh in Case Crime No.154 of 2020, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., Police Station - Kumarganj, District - Ayodhya.

¶7

After some argument, learned counsel for the applicant states that he may be permitted to withdraw this application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. with liberty to file bail application before the court below.

¶8

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

Under the circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicant to approach the court concerned for bail. In order to enable the applicant to approach the court concerned for bail, for a period of 15 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. In case, the bail application is preferred by the applicant before the court concerned, the court concerned shall decide the same expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. While considering the bail application of the applicant, the court below shall keep in mind the principles of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773.

¶10

The anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and direction.

¶11

Order Date :- 15.7.2024 D. Tamang

¶12

Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vinod Kumar Singh v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar Singh v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C/M Kisan Inter College Agwanpur vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Vijay Prajapati @ Vijay Singh and Another vs State of U.P.

Sarita vs State of Up and Another

Sattar Hussain vs State of Up

Nirmal Jain vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Sandeep Singh vs State of U.P.