The Criminal Miscellaneous Anticipatory Bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed as infructuous. The court held that the applicant had no remaining grievance or specific ground to seek relief given the rendering of the application void.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:130604
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6800 of 2024
Applicant :- Anas Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amar Jeet Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Order Date :- 12.8.2024 SK Srivastava
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application rendered infructuous can be granted.
Whether the application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is maintainable given prior circumstances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anas
State of U.P.
Another
Vivek Varma
Sailesh Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
