Amir v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Non-adjournment order only: anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. listed as fresh after none appeared to press it. No substantive ruling on bail.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6776 of 2024
Applicant :- Amir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
List has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application.
List on 12th August 2024, as fresh.
Order Date :- 12.7.2024 S.Prakash
Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Amir
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vikram D. Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/6776/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Vivek Varma
- Order 2 · Vivek Varma
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court