The High Court rejected an anticipatory bail application filed by a person who had been avoiding summons for 12 years in a criminal case involving offenses under the IPC and Lok Sampati Niwaran Adhiniyam. The court held that a person deliberately avoiding cooperation is not entitled to relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:195587
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6787 of 2024
Applicant :- Dileep Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
3 The instant anticipatory bail application has been moved by the applicant for enlarging him on bail in Case No. 1441 of 2013 arising out of Case Crime No. 797 of 2010 under Sections 147, 343, 353, 283, 427, 188 of I.P.C. & 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act 3/4 Lok Sampati Niwaran Adhiniyam, Police StationKhorabar, District-Gorakhpur.
application of the applicant may be rejected.
Order Date :- 13.12.2024 SY
Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, who has been avoiding summons for 12 years, is entitled to anticipatory bail?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Dileep Kumar
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
