Anticipatory bail sought in an online fraud case where government website hacking allegedly diverted over Rs. one crore of Kanya Vivah Yojna funds. Applicant not named in FIR but surfaced during investigation. Court found anticipatory and regular bail parameters differ; application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:114971
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6764 of 2024
Applicant :- Munazir Husain Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Wadood,Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Order Date :- 19.7.2024 Ankita
Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail in a cyber fraud case involving misappropriation of over Rs. one crore of Kanya Vivah Yojna public funds.
Whether parity with co-accused released on regular bail entitled the applicant to anticipatory bail.
9 provisions across 3 enactments
Munazir Husain
State of U.P.
Another
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
