The court referred a co-accused's anticipatory bail application to the Chief Justice due to contradictory orders on the same crime number, citing Supreme Court directives on forming appropriate Benches.
Matter placed before Hon'ble Chief Justice for placement before appropriate Bench afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6574 of 2024
Applicant :- Serajuddin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bikash Kumar Srivastava,Kamal Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Order Date :- 9.7.2024 K.K. Maurya
Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application arising from the same crime number should be placed before the Chief Justice to constitute an appropriate Bench to avoid contrary orders.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pradhani Jani Vs. State of OdishaReferred¶3
Criminal Appeal No.1503 of 2023, Pradhani Jani Vs. State of Odisha by order dated 15th May, 2023
Sajid Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶3
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.7203 of 2023, Sajid Vs. State of U.P. by order dated 31.7.2023
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Serajuddin
State of U.P.
Vikram D. Chauhan
Kamlabh Kumar Maurya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
