Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the applicant's counsel to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:190468
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3848 of 2024
Applicant :- Gajpati @ Rinku Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ved Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ashish Kumar Dwivedi,G.A.,Jitendra Pal Singh
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. List revised. No one present on behalf of the applicant to press the application. However, learned AGA for the State is present.
Order Date :- 4.12.2024 Sanjeet
Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Gajpati @ Rinku
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
