Abid v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9354 of 2024
Applicant :- Abid Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Neeraj Tomar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
- List revised.
- Sri Neeraj Tomar, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Birendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the State are present.
- Learned counsel for the applicant prays for an adjournment in the matter for a month.
- Prayer is allowed.
- Let the matter be listed on 25.09.2024.
- It is made clear that there is no interim order passed in the matter.
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/9354/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Deepak Verma
- Order 2 · Deepak Verma
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court