Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear through counsel despite having appointed advocates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:193447
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6573 of 2024
Applicant :- Balram Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Lakshman Tripathi,Sumit Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Order Date :- 10.12.2024 Sanjeet
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Balram Yadav
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
