Vijendra Singh v. State of Up
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge granted four weeks to the State to file a counter-affidavit in this anticipatory bail application. Upon receipt, it will decide whether to grant bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and conditions upon arrest under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5710 of 2024
Applicant :- Vijendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
- Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State.
- Perused the record.
- This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant-Vijendra Singh seeking his enlargement on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 82 of 2021 under Section 13 (1) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, Police Station- Cantt., DistrictGorakhpur, during the pendency of trial i.e. Special Trial No. 1299 of 2021 (State Vs. Vijendra Singh) under Section 13 (1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Police Station- Cantt., DistrictGorakhpur,
- Record shows that an F.I.R. dated 12.02.2021 was lodged by first informant-Rakesh Pandey, Litigation Clerk and was registered as Case Crime No. 0082 of 2021 under Section 13 (1) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, Police Station- Cantt., DistrictGorakhpur. In the aforesaid F.I.R. applicant Vijendra Singh, who at that time was working as ADGC/Special Public Prosecutor, has nominated as solitary named accused.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted given that the charge sheet has been filed and the matter requires further consideration.
Whether the vanishing cause of action in the parent case negates the necessity for custodial arrest.
Whether the accused should be released on personal bond with conditions if arrested during the pendency of trial.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vijendra Singh
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/5710/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Samit Gopal
- Order 2 · Samit Gopal
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court