The High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous based on the applicant's counsel's submission that it had lost its utility.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:114521
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4009 of 2024
Applicant :- Praveen Rawat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Srivastav,Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjay Singh
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Order Date :- 18.7.2024 SKT/-
Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application is maintainable given the submissions regarding infructuousness.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Praveen Rawat
State of U.P.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
