Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC rejected. The applicant was not cooperating with the investigation, was absconding, and a non-bailable warrant along with coercive process under Sections 82 and 83 CrPC had been issued against him. The court found no reason to interfere.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:113097
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5599 of 2024
Applicant :- Vineet Kumar Alias Vinay Kumar Alias Monu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Padmaker Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Virendra Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Order Date :- 16.7.2024 Neeraj
Digitally signed by :- NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail despite not cooperating with the investigation and absconding from coercive process.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Vineet Kumar Alias Vinay Kumar Alias Monu
State of U.P. and Another
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
