Piyush Panday v. State of Up
Case brief
What is this about?
Listed for argument, but counsel for the applicant was absent. The court directed the case to be placed peremptorily on a future date for compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3385 of 2024
Applicant :- Piyush Panday Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Karunesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Case called out. Counsel for the applicant is not present.
Place this case peremptorily on 24.09.2024.
Order Date :- 11.9.2024 Neeraj
Digitally signed by :- NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Piyush Panday
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/3385/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court