Brijesh Kumar Tripathi v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCA482/12824/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Section 482 application listed repeatedly without anyone appearing to press it; court noted repeated adjournments and no urgency and put the matter up on 24.10.2024 in the additional cause list.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
¶2
(SN.10)
¶3
Court No. - 79
¶4
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12824 of 2024
¶5
Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Tripathi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhinav Shukla,Laxmi Narayan Mishra,Ram Shiromani Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶6
Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
¶7
- List revised. None is present on behalf of the applicant to press the instant application even in the revised call.
¶8
- Earlier also on 16.5.2024, 10.7.2024 and 23.7.2024, the matter was adjourned on the request of the learned counsel for the applicant. Repeated adjournments has been sought by the learned counsel for the applicant on one pretext or other, therefore, it appears that there is no urgency in the matter.
¶9
- Therefore, put up this matter on 24.10.2024 in the additional cause list.
¶10
- It is made clear that the matter shall not be treated as tied up or part heard with this Bench.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Brijesh Kumar Tripathi
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Anish Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/12824/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court