Mulayam Singh Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order in an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.; counsel sought time to file rejoinder affidavit after receiving the counter affidavit, and the bench adjourned further hearing.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 8
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2439 of 2024
Applicant :- Mulayam Singh Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Rizwanul Haque Ansari,Santi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has received copy of the counter affidavit and he requires ten days' time to file rejoinder affidavit.
List on 09.01.2025.
Order Date :- 16.12.2024 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mulayam Singh Yadav
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Jaspreet Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/2439/2024
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Jitendra Pratap Singh Alias Jeetu Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.
Soni Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another
Suresh Chandra Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.
Shailendra @ Shailu Dubey vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.