Umashankar v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.; counsel for applicant reported out of station, matter deferred without any substantive discussion or decision.
What the court decided
Court No. - 8
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2429 of 2024
Applicant :- Umashankar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Rizwanul Haque Ansari,Santi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Shri Rizwanul Haque Ansari, learned counsel for the applicant is reported to be out of station.
List this matter on 16th December, 2024.
Order Date :- 2.12.2024 Ashutosh
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Umashankar
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.
Coram
Jaspreet Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/2429/2024
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Anil Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Mahesh Dutt Alias Maheshwar Dutt Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and 3 Others
Sunil Kumar Singh Vs Govt. of India Thru. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement U.P.
Rajan Maurya vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko.