Pankaj Singh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This order does not dispose of the matter; it adjourns the hearing for ten days to allow the learned Additional Government Advocate to obtain instructions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11105 of 2024
Applicant :- Pankaj Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Learned AGA submitted that he has not received instructions in the matter and seeks some time to get the same.
As prayed, put up this case after ten days as fresh.
In the meantime, learned AGA shall complete his instructions.
Order Date :- 14.11.2024 Nitin Verma
Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pankaj Singh
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/11105/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Gautam Chowdhary
- Order 2 · Gautam Chowdhary
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court