Irfan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court refused anticipatory bail on merit but directed the lower courts to decide the applicant's regular bail expeditiously upon surrender within two weeks, without coercive action during that period.
What did the court decide?
Application refused on merit; directions given for expeditious disposal of regular bail upon surrender within two weeks.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:172625
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10619 of 2024
Applicant :- Irfan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- R.S. Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
- The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.137 of 2024, under Section 379 IPC, Police Station- G.R.P., District- Gorakhpur.
- After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.
- Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.
- Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted on merit when the applicant seeks expeditious decision instead.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Irfan
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Deepak Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/10619/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court