In an anticipatory bail application where the applicant withdrew the main prayer on merit, the High Court directed expeditious regular bail hearing if the applicant surrendered within two weeks and suspended coercive action during that interim period.
Expeditious bail hearing directed on surrender within two weeks; coercive action suspended.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:172494
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10641 of 2024
Applicant :- Vishnu Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Himanshu Shukla,Narendra Mohan,Shiksha Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 5.11.2024
Nitin Verma
Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court can allow an alternative prayer for expeditious hearing and interim protection when the primary bail plea is not pressed on merit
Whether the applicant is granted coercive action suspension for the pending period
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶11
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vishnu Kumar
Deepak Verma
Nitin Verma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
