The High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application, directing the applicant to apply for regular bail within two weeks before the trial court. The court granted no coercive action during this period.
Direction to applicant to apply for regular bail before trial court within two weeks; no coercive action during this period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:172940
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7872 of 2024
Applicant :- Anuj Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Bharti Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 5.11.2024 Meenu Singh
Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application is to be dismissed only after applying the principles laid down in Supreme Court judgments.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
2021 SCC OnLine SC 922 · Who else cites this
Anuj Kumar
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
