Disposed

Jyoti Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Allahabad HC8 Jan 2024A483/4/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. by directing the trial court to decide the pending dowry and cruelty case expeditiously, strictly in accordance with law, by affording opportunities to parties and fixing short dates without unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direction to trial court to decide criminal case expeditiously.

Jyoti Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home… — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:1896

¶2

Court No. - 11

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 4 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Jyoti Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Ahmad Mehdi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Nushrat Jahan, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

¶7

2. In view of the proposed order, the notice to apposite party No.2 is hereby dispensed with.

¶8

3. By means of this petition filed under Section 483 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed for issuance of direction to the learned court below i.e. the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, First, Ayodhya to decide the Criminal Case No.897 of 2020 (State vs. Ravindra Yadav) arising out of the Chargesheet No.226 of 2020 dated 20.06.2020 in pursuance of Case Crime / F.I.R. No.15 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 323 & 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police StationCantt., District-Ayodhya, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, First, Ayodhya since 2020, expeditiously within stipulated period of time.

¶9

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter at some length has requested that ends of justice would suffice if necessary directions for disposal of the aforesaid criminal case is issued to the learned court below, strictly in accordance with law, within the time stipulated.

¶10

5. Learned Additional Government Advocate has no objection to the aforesaid innocuous prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶11

6. Considering the aforesaid innocuous prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of finally this petition at the admission stage directing the learned trial court i.e. learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, First, Ayodhya, to consider and decide the Criminal Case No.897 of 2020 (State vs. Ravindra Yadav) arising out of the Charge-sheet No.226 of 2020 dated

¶12

20.06.2020 in pursuance of Case Crime / F.I.R. No.15 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 323 & 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Cantt., District-Ayodhya, pending before her/ him since 2020, expeditiously strictly in accordance with law, by affording an opportunity to the parties concerned and by fixing short dates and without giving any unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties.

¶13

[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]

¶14

Order Date :- 8.1.2024 Suresh/

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Jyoti Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jyoti Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Diwakar Verma Alias Ramdiwakar and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Angad Pathak and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Ravi Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Jyoti Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Braj Kishore Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Ram Dayal Pal and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another