Disposed

Ravi Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC5 Jan 2024/29/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court disposed of a bail application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Permitting the applicant to file personal bonds and requiring two sureties in one case, valid across all five pending bail applications where surety availability was an issue, citing precedents.

What did the court decide?

Direction to file personal bonds in all cases; two sureties in one case to be treated valid in all other cases.

Ravi Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:1397

¶2

Court No. - 11

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Ravi Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶7

2. By means this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed to relax the condition of bail to the extent that accused applicant be allowed to file two sureties in any case and the same shall be treated adequate in all five cases in which he has already been bailed out.

¶8

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in para-6 of the petition has categorically stated that against the petitioner/ applicant there are five cases wherein he has already been granted bail, but because of non-availability of 10 sureties, he is unable to file bail bonds, therefore, in this regard a prayer has been made that the petitioner/ applicant may be permitted to file two sureties in all the cases. It is also stated that in similarly situated matters, this Court has granted relief.

¶9

4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018), the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. Similarly, orders have been passed by a co-ordinate bench of this Court as well and in one of such matters in Writ Petition (MS) No.30481 of 2018 (Imran Vs. State of U.P.) the order has been passed on 16.11.2018.

¶10

5. In view of the above circumstances, this petition is disposed of finally with a direction that petitioner shall file personal bonds in all the cases, however, two sureties in one case shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Court concerned which shall be treated valid in all other cases wherein bail has been granted.

¶11

[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]

¶12

Order Date :- 5.1.2024 Suresh/

¶13

Digitally signed by :- RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ravi Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pooja Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Alok Gautam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt.of Home and Another

Laddan Khan and 7 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home Deptt Govt of Up Civil Sectt Lko and 2 Others

Ram Diwakar Verma Alias Ramdiwakar and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Angad Pathak and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Amarjeet Yadav @ Lucky Yadav and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, U.P. Lko. and Another