Dismissed

Pappu Alias Radheshyam and Another v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC18 Jul 2024A482/8610/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash criminal proceedings as vacated and not pressed, but directed the applicant to file a bail application within two weeks for consideration. Order date 18.7.2024. Court of Allahabad High Court.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as not pressed, but directed to file a bail application within two weeks for consideration.

Pappu Alias Radheshyam and Another vs State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:114357

¶2

Court No. - 77

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8610 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Pappu Alias Radheshyam And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shravan Kumar Pandey,Shyam Narain Pandey

¶5

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶7

List revised.

¶8

Heard Sri Shyam Narain Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State and perused the records.

¶9

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants- Pappu @ Radheshyam and Vikash, with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the entire proceeding as well as charge-sheet dated 26.08.2022 in Criminal Case No. 747 of 2022 (State Vs. Pappu @ Radheshyam and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 0062 of 2022, under Sections 452, 354(A), 323, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Salempur, District Bulandshahar, pending in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.), Bulandshahar, with a further prayer that proceedings of the aforesaid case be stayed during the pendency of the present application.

¶10

After arguments on merits at length, learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press the prayers made in the present petition. He states that the purpose of the applicants would be served if they are permitted to appear before the trial court within a period of two weeks from today and file a regular bail application.

¶11

Learned counsel for the State has no objection of aforesaid arguments of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶12

In view of the above, the prayer as prayed for is dismissed as not pressed.

¶13

However, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the

¶14

case and looking to the limited prayer of learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that if the accused-applicants appear and apply for bail before the court concerned within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.

¶15

The present application is disposed of.

¶16

Order Date :- 18.7.2024 AS Rathore

¶17

(Samit Gopal,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pappu Alias Radheshyam and Another v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Alias Radheshyam and Another v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Chand Mittal and Another vs State of Up and Another

Smt Sushila Devi vs State of U.P. and Another

Jagveer and 5 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Mukesh and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Tejendra Singh and Another vs State of Up and Another

Deepak Kapoor and Another vs State of Up and Another