Disposed

Mukesh and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Jul 2024A482/12640/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applants filed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of a summoning order. Counsel withdrew the primary prayer to appear for bail; the court directed applicants to file a regular bail application within two weeks. The application was disposed of without analyzing merits.

What did the court decide?

Applicants permitted to appear and file bail application within two weeks. Present application disposed of as prayed for was not pressed.

Mukesh and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:114510

¶2

Court No. - 77

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12640 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Mukesh And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Utkarsha Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶6

List revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Utkarsha Shukla, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Triveni Saran Rai, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.

¶8

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants-Mukesh, Kunwar Pal, Ajesh, Jai Pal and Raman Babu with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the summoning order dated 30.1.2024 passed by C.J.M. Nawabganj, District Bareilly arising out of Case Crime No.48 of 2014 in Criminal Case No.498 of 2016 (State Vs. Kanhailal and others) u/s 147, 148, 149, 379, 420, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Quoldia, District Bareilly with a further prayer to stay the effect and operation of aforesaid summoning order passed in the aforesaid case during the pendency of the present application.

¶9

After arguments on merits at length learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press the prayers made in the present petition. He states that the purpose of the applicants would be served if they are permitted to appear before the trial court within a period of two weeks from today and file a regular bail application.

¶10

Learned counsel for the State has no objection of aforesaid arguments of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶11

In view of the above, the prayer as prayed for is dismissed as not pressed.

¶12

However, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the limited prayer of learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that if the accused-applicants appear and

¶13

apply for bail before the court concerned within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.

¶14

The present application is disposed of.

¶15

(Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 18.7.2024 Gaurav Kuls

¶16

Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mukesh and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Chand Mittal and Another vs State of Up and Another

Smt Sushila Devi vs State of U.P. and Another

Jagveer and 5 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Tejendra Singh and Another vs State of Up and Another

Pappu Alias Radheshyam and Another vs State of Up and Another

Deepak Kapoor and Another vs State of Up and Another