A writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution was dismissed on the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the same at this stage, with the State respondents having no objection.
None; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:48169
Court No. - 11
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5567 of 2024
Applicant :- Brijendra Pratap Singh @ Pappu Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lko. U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents.
2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition at this stage.
3. Learned counsel for respondents has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
Order Date :- 16.7.2024
prateek
Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Brijendra Pratap Singh @ Pappu Singh and Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lko. U.P. and Another
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
