In a quashing application, the court directed the trial court to verify the filed compromise by issuing notices to signatories. No coercive action was taken against the applicants for one month while verification proceeds.
Direction to trial court to verify compromise; one-month stay on coercive actions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:43873
Court No. - 12
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5434 of 2024 Applicant :- Mohd. Atif And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Raziullah,Gayasuddeen Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 21.6.2024 V. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for quashing criminal proceedings should be decided given the prima facie claim of compromise.
What direction should the High Court issue to the trial court regarding verification of the filed compromise.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohd. Atif And 2 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
