The applicant's counsel informed that the order of the writ court had been complied with. Consequently, the court held that the contempt application lost its efficacy and dismissed it as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:49117
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2444 of 2024
Applicant :- Sabhajeet Yadav Opposite Party :- Sri Amit Kumar Singh, P.S.F., Divisional Forest Officer, Social Forestry, Forest Range Sultanpur Counsel for Applicant :- Hanumant Lal Yadav
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 22.7.2024 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application has lost efficacy due to compliance with the writ court order?
Sabhajeet Yadav
Sri Amit Kumar Singh, P.S.F., Divisional Forest Officer, Social Forestry, Forest Range Sultanpur
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
