The High Court heard an application to quash a non bailable warrant. It directed that no coercive action be taken for four weeks or until the applicant appears before the trial court, while dismissing potential future fictitious applications.
No coercive action to be taken for 4 weeks or until applicant moves appropriate application in trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:194687
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42635 of 2024
Applicant :- Intezar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
accordance with law. For a period of 4 weeks or till the applicant move an application before the trial Court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. Further, the Court shall not entertain the fictitious and repetitive personal exemption application, and if filed, the same shall be dismissed with reasonable costs.
Order Date :- 12.12.2024 A. Tripathi
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- AKHILESH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether quashing of non bailable warrant order is appropriate given the applicant's claim of lack of knowledge about proceedings.
Whether coercive action shall be taken against the applicant during a specified period after granting exemption.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Intezar
State of U.P.
Vinod Diwakar
Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
