Section 482 CrPC application to quash a POCOSO and IPC charge-sheet, cognizance order and trial proceedings. Court noted the victim had voluntarily married the applicant and they lived together, found continuation futile, and quashed the entire proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:195180
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16705 of 2024
Applicant :- Mithlesh Kumar And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ghanshyam Das Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
for the parties, and have gone through the entire record.
Order Date :- 12.12.2024 Shafique
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether proceedings under Sections 363, 366, 504 IPC and Section 7/8 POCSO should be quashed given the victim married the applicant of her own will and did not support the prosecution case.
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Mithlesh Kumar And 3 Others
State Of U.P.
Opposite Party 3 Others
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
