Disposed

Pramod Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC22 Oct 2024A482/29917/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicants sought quashing of criminal proceedings and cognizance/summoning order arising from a charge-sheet for offences punishable up to seven years. After some arguments counsel withdrew the application with liberty to file a regular bail application; the court disposed of it with that liberty and directed bail be decided per cited Supreme Court judgments.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to withdraw application and file regular bail application before competent jurisdiction.

Pramod Kumar and Another vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:168064

¶2

Court No. - 77 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29917 of 2024 Applicant :- Pramod Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Mohan Pandey,Om Prakash Katiyar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

¶4

Sri Anand Mohan Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Chhavi Pal Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶5

The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 6935 of 2024, (State Vs. Pramod and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 106 of 2023, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506, 354, 354-B of I.P.C., Police Station- Aliganj, District- Etah, as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 13.3.2024, pending in the Court of A.C.J.M., Court Room No. 18, Etah.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants were not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge-sheet have been submitted against them. It is further submitted that the offence is punishable up to 7 years imprisonment.

¶7

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶8

In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941.

¶9

The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

¶10

Order Date :- 22.10.2024/A.P. Pandey

¶11

Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pramod Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pratap Singh and Others vs State of Up and Another

Abhisek vs State of U.P. and Another

Gyanendra Tiwari Alias Gyanu Tiwari and Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Bainami and 5 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Sachin Prajapati vs State of Up and Another

Anil Kumar Singh and 5 Others vs State of Up and 2 Others