Arvind v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In an oral hearing with no appearance by the applicant, the High Court ordered the application to be put up as fresh on a specific date, clarifying no interim orders had been passed.
In an oral hearing with no appearance by the applicant, the High Court ordered the application to be put up as fresh on a specific date, clarifying no interim orders had been passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28079 of 2024
Applicant :- Arvind Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Even in the revised call, none appears for the applicant, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
In the interest of justice, put up this case on 28.10.2024, as fresh.
It is made clear that no interim order has been passed.
Order Date :- 17.9.2024 A.P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind
Arvind
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
A.P. Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court