Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed to quash proceedings based on a compromise. The Court directed the parties to appear before the trial court to verify the compromise and report back, refraining from immediate quashing.
Directions to trial court for verification of compromise; stay on coercive measures against applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27391 of 2024
Applicant :- Samim Ahmad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Hasan Parvej Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
preferably within a period of one month from today. While passing the order verifying the compromise, the concerned court shall also record the statement of the parties as to whether all the terms and conditions mentioned in the original compromise deed, so filed, have been fulfilled or not?
Order Date :- 20.9.2024 Jitendra/-
Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash the proceedings based on a compromise between parties?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh v. State of PunjabReferred
(2012) 10 SCC 303 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Samim Ahmad
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
