The applicant in Section 482 application appeared in person but was in default. The learned Advocate General General present. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:184834
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26675 of 2024
Applicant :- Ravindra Sharma And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akshay Mishra,Vinit Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
On the last occasion, learned counsel for the applicants was granted time to file supplementary affidavit annexing the medical report of injured person.
Today, when the matter is taken up none has appeared on behalf of the applicants, even in the revised call.
However, learned A.G.A. is present.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 25.11.2024 Radhika
Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravindra Sharma and 3 Others
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Radhika Vishwakarma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
