A Section 482 application by the applicant against the CBI was adjourned: respondents were given liberty to file counter affidavits or objections before the next date of listing, and the trial court was asked to note that the application remained pending before this court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 15
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2581 of 2024
Applicant :- Tripti Shakya Opposite Party :- Central Bureau Of Invetigation Thru. Its Superitemndent Of Police And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pranshu Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anurag Kumar Singh,Romit Seth,Shishir Prakash
Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.
Order Date :- 18.3.2024 MVS/-
Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tripti Shakya
Central Bureau Of Investigation Thru. Its Superintendent Of Police
Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
