In this contempt application, the court held that the proceeding lost efficacy as the writ court order was complied with and the matter under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was decided. Consequently, the application was dismissed as infructuous.
The contempt application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2104 of 2024
Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Shukla Opposite Party :- Namrita Dubey, Nayab Tehsildar, Haidergarh, Barabanki
Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Chandra Tewari
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 24.7.2024 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present contempt application lost its efficacy consequent upon compliance with the order of the writ court and decision under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arvind Kumar Shukla
Namrita Dubey
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
